An Additional District and Sessions Court (South) has issued non-bailable arrest warrants for Salman Iqbal, chief executive officer of ARY Network, and anchorperson Arshad Sharif after they failed to appear in a case pertaining to running a smear campaign through a talk show, Power Play, against Jang/Geo Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman.
The local court had earlier issued their bailable arrest warrants but they neither appeared before it nor submitted the bail amount.
Jang Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman was acquitted of a NAB reference on January 31, 2022, on merit by an accountability court.
The reference was about a land purchase from a private owner in 1986.
In the ARY News talk show, Power Play, aired on February 1, while running a defamation campaign, the anchorperson “deliberately misinterpreted” the January 31 judgment of a Lahore accountability court alleging that the court acquitted Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman in the case, due to the amendments in the NAB Ordinance in the year 2021, thereby receiving an NRO, rather than the case being decided on merit.
In fact, Jang Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman was acquitted of the NAB reference on January 31, 2022 on merit by Honourable Accountability Court No 1, Lahore.
While passing the judgment, the court apparently did not rely on the NAB Amendments added/amended in the year 2021 and gave its conclusive finding in para No24, of the said judgment.
The relevant para reproduced in the order read, “There is no supportive material with the prosecution to prove the involvement of Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman and his co-accused in this case and there is no probability of the petitioner/ accused and his co-accused being convicted, hence further proceedings in the case would be nothing but a futile exercise which must be curbed under section 265-K Cr.P.C. The court is competent to exercise its power under section 265-K Cr.P.C. where, taking available material as true, yet there is no probability of conviction or where charge appears to be groundless and the further process would be nothing but an abuse of process of law.”
It is pertinent to mention that on previous occasions, ARY London had repeatedly apologised for defaming Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman.